首页 > 日积月累 > 黎曼猜想仍未被证明:Xian Jin Li已放弃他的论文

黎曼猜想仍未被证明:Xian Jin Li已放弃他的论文

2008年7月6日 康爷 发表评论 阅读评论

related news:

Will John Nash retire?The Riemann Hypothesis may have been proved!
What is Riemann Hypothesis?
It seems that Xian-Jin Li’s proven is wrong…
Who is Xian-Jin Li?

在Xian Jin Li发布文章的网站:http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.0090 ,我们看到醒目的一行字:

Abstract: This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake on page 29.

恩,下面列了他的论文的几个版本,据说Version 4解决了陶哲轩的问题:

Submission history

From: Xian-Jin Li [view email]
[v1] Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:43:13 GMT (20kb)
[v2] Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:05:52 GMT (20kb)
[v3] Thu, 3 Jul 2008 03:44:03 GMT (20kb)
[v4] Sun, 6 Jul 2008 01:29:38 GMT (0kb,I)

可惜,在29页的错误给了Xian Jin Li致命的打击~下面我们再来回顾下Alain的问题:

I don’t like to be too negative in my comments. Li’s paper is an attempt to prove a variant of the global trace formula of my paper in Selecta.The “proof” is that of Theorem 7.3 page 29 in Li’s paper, but I stopped reading it when I saw that he is extending the test function h from ideles to adeles by 0 outside ideles and then using Fourier transform(see page 31). This cannot work and ideles form a set of measure 0inside adeles (unlike what happens when one only deals with finitely many places).

出问题的那个方程是:

We extend “h” to a function on “A” by defining h(lambda)=0 for lambda not in “J”.

image Alain Connes

分类: 日积月累 标签:
  1. 王刚
    2008年7月7日23:31 | #1

    连希尔伯特都折服的猜想,在本世纪能被证明的话就不错了.

  2. 康爷
    2008年7月7日23:40 | #2

    希尔伯特的23个问题也解决了一点了啊

  1. 本文目前尚无任何 trackbacks 和 pingbacks.